Review finds non-drug approaches for low back pain are cost-effective
A systematic review of 20 studies shows that non-surgical and non-drug treatments for low back pain provide cost-effective relief for patients.
FTMQ Health, written by our newsroom0 views
UA.NEWS reported that a systematic review published in the journal PLOS Medicine on October 27, 2026, found that several non-drug and non-surgical treatments for low back pain may be cost-effective. The research was led by Manuela Lureiro Ferreira of the George Institute for Global Health in Australia. The researchers analyzed 20 studies conducted between 2005 and 2026, which involved a total of 14,884 human participants. [1]
The authors evaluated interventions that are recommended by major health bodies, including the World Health Organization, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and the North American Spine Society, according to UA.NEWS. The evaluated treatments included yoga, acupuncture, massage, psychological therapy, and spinal manipulation. [1]
A systematic review is a scientific synthesis that extracts, interprets, and critically appraises data from published studies on a specific topic. In scientific and medical research, systematic reviews are generally considered to be the highest level in the hierarchy of evidence. [2]
As FTMQ Health reported earlier, systematic reviews are frequently utilized to evaluate growing health risks and treatment efficacy across populations. [4]
In short
- A review of 20 studies involving 14,884 people found non-drug back pain treatments to be cost-effective.
- The systematic review was published in PLOS Medicine on October 27, 2026.
- Interventions analyzed included yoga, acupuncture, massage, psychological therapy, and spinal manipulation.
Sources
Every paragraph above points to the numbered items it rests on. Read the originals here.
- [1]Systematic review identifies cost-effective methods for low back pain — News-MedicalUA.NEWS, 5h ago (the report this story comes from)
Background
- [2]Systematic review on Wikipedia
- [3]Cass Review on Wikipedia
- [4]Review identifies rodent virus as growing risk in pregnancy and cities FTMQ Health, 3d ago
Our newsroom writes these reports with the help of software, from the 4 sources listed and nothing else, and checks them against those sources. Facts can still be wrong or move on; the originals are the record. Spotted a mistake? Write to daniel@monsterkong.com.
Related from FTMQ Health
Earlier reports of ours on the same people and subjects.
- Healthcare research lacks consistent standards for reporting intervention acceptabilityMedical Science, 1d ago
- New brain injury framework evaluated in large human observational studiesMedical Science, 7d ago
- Physical activity improves mood and quality of life during menopauseFitness, 10d ago
- Perimenopausal women report higher anxiety levels than other groupsTop Stories, 2d ago
More in Top Stories
- First person receives trial vaccine for rare Ebola strain1h ago
- Study connects vaginal microbiome composition with psychological traits in young women1d ago
- Six in 10 parents experience sensory overload new survey finds1d ago
- Wales hospital leaders defend safety despite severe overcrowding and staff shortages2d ago
- Perimenopausal women report higher anxiety levels than other groups2d ago
- Researchers link over 1,200 genetic variants to five personality traits3d ago
Get the day in one email
Reports like this one, the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning. Free, one email a day; readers can comment under every report.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.
Comments
Loading
Join the conversation
Comments are open to readers of our daily email: the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning, free. Sign up and the comment box opens.
Already on the list? Enter the same address and we will send a sign-in link.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.